<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Test-Driven Development is&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://blog.gdinwiddie.com/2008/01/29/what-test-driven-development-is/</link>
	<description>Effective software development</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Agile Jedi</title>
		<link>http://blog.gdinwiddie.com/2008/01/29/what-test-driven-development-is/#comment-27442</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.gdinwiddie.com/2008/01/29/what-test-driven-development-is/#comment-27442</guid>
					<description>Another great point! No matter how often I try to make this point is seems, for some,  to always fall on deaf ears.

Thanks,
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great point! No matter how often I try to make this point is seems, for some,  to always fall on deaf ears.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Dinwiddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.gdinwiddie.com/2008/01/29/what-test-driven-development-is/#comment-22668</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.gdinwiddie.com/2008/01/29/what-test-driven-development-is/#comment-22668</guid>
					<description>Keith Ray points out his post, on Behavior Driven Development (http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/blog/2006/08/12/).  I have no problem with the language of BDD, and if it keeps people from getting stuck on the testing aspect, rather than the design aspect, then it's a clear win.  On the other hand, there are plenty of people who have been doing TDD "right," thank you very much, and don't need to re-work their vocabulary to get the value out of it.  I'm fine with that, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Ray points out his post, on Behavior Driven Development (http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/blog/2006/08/12/).  I have no problem with the language of BDD, and if it keeps people from getting stuck on the testing aspect, rather than the design aspect, then it&#8217;s a clear win.  On the other hand, there are plenty of people who have been doing TDD &#8220;right,&#8221; thank you very much, and don&#8217;t need to re-work their vocabulary to get the value out of it.  I&#8217;m fine with that, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
